<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Web Services Contraptions - Audio</title>
    <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Gerald Beuchelt</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:36:59 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.1.8102.813</generator>
    <managingEditor>work@beuchelt.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>work@beuchelt.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=da09785d-69b7-4cbd-8a2c-10f478edfc80</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,da09785d-69b7-4cbd-8a2c-10f478edfc80.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,da09785d-69b7-4cbd-8a2c-10f478edfc80.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=da09785d-69b7-4cbd-8a2c-10f478edfc80</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">To day, I would like to take a peek at
a technology that has been living in the shadows for some time. While HDTV and digital
broadcast over-the-air have been getting some attention lately (especially with the
January 17, 2009 deadline looming), digital radio broadcast have not been getting
any significant media attention in the U.S.A. 
<br />
One of the reasons for the lack of attention might be that the <a href="http://www.hdradio.com/">digital
radio standard</a> chosen by the FCC has been met with some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_Radio#Criticisms">serious
criticism</a>. The two arguments that are most profound here in my mind are sound
quality and proprietariness. 
<br />
Nevertheless, since I am listening to a lot of radio during the day, I have decided
to give this broadcast system a try. For receiving, I chose the <a href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;productId=8198552921665401984">Sony
XDR-F1HD</a> component tuner that allows most easy integration with a standard stereo
system. Connections are made simply through RCA style component wires. The system
comes with an AM and FM antenna cable, but standard connection (e.g. to you home TV
antenna) are available. The unit is very simple to configure and has - in addition
to the radio program information - a large clock. The display is illuminated. 
<br />
Reception of FM HD radio stations is - overall - pretty good, even under adverse conditions.
My antenna is setup inside the Sun office, which is a steel reenforced concrete building
with excellent radio shielding qualities (sigh!). In addition, the indoor antenna
cable is close to two CRT monitors and a variety of transformers. Most strong stations
(such as WGBH) are readily avilable with little or no reception problems. However,
AM reception is rather spotty and so far I have only been able to receive WBZ when
holding the antenna at 83 degrees North-North-West about 3'7" above my desk. 
<br />
The sound quality is most of the times acceptable. The radio signal codec is a proprietary
version of the AAC encoding, encoded at 36 kbit/sec. This is far from being CD quality,
but it does remove the noise floor of the FM signal to a large extend. 
<br />
Overall, I would probably recommend this setup, as long as the broadcasting community
is dedicated to continue using this sytem. 
<br /><br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=da09785d-69b7-4cbd-8a2c-10f478edfc80" /></body>
      <title>Review Friday: Sony XDR-F1HD HD-Radio Component Tuner</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,da09785d-69b7-4cbd-8a2c-10f478edfc80.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2008/06/27/Review+Friday+Sony+XDRF1HD+HDRadio+Component+Tuner.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>To day, I would like to take a peek at a technology that has been living in the shadows for some time. While HDTV and digital broadcast over-the-air have been getting some attention lately (especially with the January 17, 2009 deadline looming), digital radio broadcast have not been getting any significant media attention in the U.S.A. &lt;br&gt;
One of the reasons for the lack of attention might be that the &lt;a href="http://www.hdradio.com/"&gt;digital
radio standard&lt;/a&gt; chosen by the FCC has been met with some &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_Radio#Criticisms"&gt;serious
criticism&lt;/a&gt;. The two arguments that are most profound here in my mind are sound
quality and proprietariness. 
&lt;br&gt;
Nevertheless, since I am listening to a lot of radio during the day, I have decided
to give this broadcast system a try. For receiving, I chose the &lt;a href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;amp;storeId=10151&amp;amp;langId=-1&amp;amp;productId=8198552921665401984"&gt;Sony
XDR-F1HD&lt;/a&gt; component tuner that allows most easy integration with a standard stereo
system. Connections are made simply through RCA style component wires. The system
comes with an AM and FM antenna cable, but standard connection (e.g. to you home TV
antenna) are available. The unit is very simple to configure and has - in addition
to the radio program information - a large clock. The display is illuminated. 
&lt;br&gt;
Reception of FM HD radio stations is - overall - pretty good, even under adverse conditions.
My antenna is setup inside the Sun office, which is a steel reenforced concrete building
with excellent radio shielding qualities (sigh!). In addition, the indoor antenna
cable is close to two CRT monitors and a variety of transformers. Most strong stations
(such as WGBH) are readily avilable with little or no reception problems. However,
AM reception is rather spotty and so far I have only been able to receive WBZ when
holding the antenna at 83 degrees North-North-West about 3'7" above my desk. 
&lt;br&gt;
The sound quality is most of the times acceptable. The radio signal codec is a proprietary
version of the AAC encoding, encoded at 36 kbit/sec. This is far from being CD quality,
but it does remove the noise floor of the FM signal to a large extend. 
&lt;br&gt;
Overall, I would probably recommend this setup, as long as the broadcasting community
is dedicated to continue using this sytem. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=da09785d-69b7-4cbd-8a2c-10f478edfc80" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,da09785d-69b7-4cbd-8a2c-10f478edfc80.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=48619272-6453-49ee-8789-2b651be86f33</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,48619272-6453-49ee-8789-2b651be86f33.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,48619272-6453-49ee-8789-2b651be86f33.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=48619272-6453-49ee-8789-2b651be86f33</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">There are quite a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSN2844446320080129">few
indications </a>that the hopes for an industry backed, ad-supported music exchange
were - at the least - <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSN2844446320080129">too
early.</a> Maybe it's a scam, maybe it is just a test-balloon, but in a world of iTunes
hating music companies, this scheme did make some sense...<br /><p><b>tag:</b><a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/qtrax" rel="tag">qtrax</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iPod" rel="tag">iPod</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/music" rel="tag">music</a></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=48619272-6453-49ee-8789-2b651be86f33" /></body>
      <title>Or maybe not</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,48619272-6453-49ee-8789-2b651be86f33.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2008/01/30/Or+Maybe+Not.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>There are quite a &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSN2844446320080129"&gt;few
indications &lt;/a&gt;that the hopes for an industry backed, ad-supported music exchange
were - at the least - &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSN2844446320080129"&gt;too
early.&lt;/a&gt; Maybe it's a scam, maybe it is just a test-balloon, but in a world of iTunes
hating music companies, this scheme did make some sense...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/qtrax" rel="tag"&gt;qtrax&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iPod" rel="tag"&gt;iPod&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/music" rel="tag"&gt;music&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=48619272-6453-49ee-8789-2b651be86f33" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,48619272-6453-49ee-8789-2b651be86f33.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=29cd3033-7d70-4caa-884a-5106f30217b8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,29cd3033-7d70-4caa-884a-5106f30217b8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,29cd3033-7d70-4caa-884a-5106f30217b8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=29cd3033-7d70-4caa-884a-5106f30217b8</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Maybe, maybe: there are signs on the horizon that the content industry will finally
come to grips with the harsh reality that their old models just do not work anymore
the way they used to: enter <a href="http://www.qtrax.com/">Qtrax</a>, a free, ad-supported
P2P network that claims to have the blessings from a bunch of major labels, including
Sony/BMG and EMI. Qtrax will <a href="http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/01/major-labels-al.html">lauch
tonight</a>, so soon we will know more. 
</p>
        <p>
Overall, this might be a sign that the RIAA monopoly is finally understanding that
suing their customers is not a good way of advertising your goods. And while MP3s
are not exactly the encoding that HiFi fans' dreams are made out of, it is still an
interesting start into a hopefully much brighter future. 
</p>
        <p>
There are a few things that really interest me: 
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
            <p>
They are using the Mozilla rendering engine. That is a good thing. Period. 
</p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p>
They promise iPod compatibility. Hmm.. this sounds odd, since the iPod is quite capable
of playing back MP3s. Now - assuming for the moment that they <i>are</i> using MP3s
- why would you need to make the iPod compatible? Unless there is some sort of DRM
or platform lock-in included ... we will see in about 3.5 hours ;-)
</p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p>
Who will be the ad source, ie. which advertising seller will get the opportunity to
get access to a potentially gigantic market. While I have absolutely no idea, I'd
be surprised if the name of that company started with a 'G'. 
</p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p>
How will Apple and the market react? At the end of the day, this whole thing is a
thinly-veiled attack against Apples extremely strong position with the iPod and iTunes.
If Qtrax can offer a similar level of ease-of-use, Mr. Jobs will have to do some very
creative thinking. 
</p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p>
What is their Linux story? Or - to rephrase the question in a more interesting way:
What is their open source/open specification story? I can see that they are not particularly
interested in opening up their platform, as this would directly undercut their ad-based
business model. But will they allow ports or make the engine at least reasonably portable
to other OSes, including Linux, but also Symbian or other cell-phone OSes (and - of
course - OpenSolaris)?
</p>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <p>
We will see ... soon. 
</p>
        <p>
          <b>tag:</b>
          <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iPod" rel="tag">iPod</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/apple" rel="tag">apple</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/audio" rel="tag">audio</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/music" rel="tag">music</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/qtrax" rel="tag">qtrax</a></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=29cd3033-7d70-4caa-884a-5106f30217b8" />
      </body>
      <title>There is still hope</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,29cd3033-7d70-4caa-884a-5106f30217b8.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2008/01/28/There+Is+Still+Hope.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Maybe, maybe: there are signs on the horizon that the content industry will finally
come to grips with the harsh reality that their old models just do not work anymore
the way they used to: enter &lt;a href="http://www.qtrax.com/"&gt;Qtrax&lt;/a&gt;, a free, ad-supported
P2P network that claims to have the blessings from a bunch of major labels, including
Sony/BMG and EMI. Qtrax will &lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/01/major-labels-al.html"&gt;lauch
tonight&lt;/a&gt;, so soon we will know more. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Overall, this might be a sign that the RIAA monopoly is finally understanding that
suing their customers is not a good way of advertising your goods. And while MP3s
are not exactly the encoding that HiFi fans' dreams are made out of, it is still an
interesting start into a hopefully much brighter future. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There are a few things that really interest me: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
They are using the Mozilla rendering engine. That is a good thing. Period. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
They promise iPod compatibility. Hmm.. this sounds odd, since the iPod is quite capable
of playing back MP3s. Now - assuming for the moment that they &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; using MP3s
- why would you need to make the iPod compatible? Unless there is some sort of DRM
or platform lock-in included ... we will see in about 3.5 hours ;-)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Who will be the ad source, ie. which advertising seller will get the opportunity to
get access to a potentially gigantic market. While I have absolutely no idea, I'd
be surprised if the name of that company started with a 'G'. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
How will Apple and the market react? At the end of the day, this whole thing is a
thinly-veiled attack against Apples extremely strong position with the iPod and iTunes.
If Qtrax can offer a similar level of ease-of-use, Mr. Jobs will have to do some very
creative thinking. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
What is their Linux story? Or - to rephrase the question in a more interesting way:
What is their open source/open specification story? I can see that they are not particularly
interested in opening up their platform, as this would directly undercut their ad-based
business model. But will they allow ports or make the engine at least reasonably portable
to other OSes, including Linux, but also Symbian or other cell-phone OSes (and - of
course - OpenSolaris)?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We will see ... soon. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iPod" rel="tag"&gt;iPod&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/apple" rel="tag"&gt;apple&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/audio" rel="tag"&gt;audio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/music" rel="tag"&gt;music&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/qtrax" rel="tag"&gt;qtrax&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=29cd3033-7d70-4caa-884a-5106f30217b8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,29cd3033-7d70-4caa-884a-5106f30217b8.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=fe6a6810-1dc4-4b8c-97a3-8167e8b52b99</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,fe6a6810-1dc4-4b8c-97a3-8167e8b52b99.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,fe6a6810-1dc4-4b8c-97a3-8167e8b52b99.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=fe6a6810-1dc4-4b8c-97a3-8167e8b52b99</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
For years I have been playing around with all kinds of computer based TV and multi-media
solutions and toys: Windows MCE in its various editions from 2004 to Vista, early
versions of MythTV and proprietary stuff. Until now none of these where really at
a point where they were actually useful for a family room: 
</p>
        <p>
While Windows did have a reasonable UI from the start, the fact that it recorded to
a highly proprietary format with nasty DRM implication was a deal-killer right from
the start. Some of the tuner-cards (like ATI) attempted to mitigate this by bundling
plugins for MPEG-2 conversion, but these were implemented rather clumsily and had
frequent failures. 
<br /></p>
        <p>
MythTV was - until recently - also more of a geek toy: nice for my lab or office,
but nothing I could really throw at my family. Now, with the 0.20 config found in
the Gutsy release of Mythbuntu, MythTV takes a rather large leap towards usability. 
</p>
        <ul>
          <li>
            <p>
The UI is basically usable and driver support (especially for the tuner cards) is
becoming acceptable. I am using an WinTV HVR-950 USB stick now with my digital-over-the-air
setup and there is not a lot more I could ask for in terms of device support. 
</p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p>
The proprietary NVidia drivers are good enough and support the motion extensions that
are needed to offload motion processing to the GPU. 
</p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p>
For audio, I require at the very least S/PDIF support (mostly for lossy Dolby Digital,
but there is no other format like e.g. MLP being used for digital TV at this time),
which has been quite painful, but ultimately doable. 
</p>
          </li>
          <li>
            <p>
There seems to be decent remote support, but I am right now still fighting with my
old ATI Remote Wonder (I think that I will cave in here at some point in time though). 
</p>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <p>
The by far most important factor for family room usability for me is RTC wakeup: I
could not near having a computer with its nasty fans running all the time. Enter ACPI
controlled RTC wakeup: using a <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MythTV/Install/WhatNext/ACPIWake">couple
of scripts</a><sup>[1]</sup>, I was able to make the MythTV box boot up in time for
any show that I wanted to record. Very cool.
</p>
        <p>
One thing that I was fighting with in the end was a problem with the way MythTV could
be shut down automatically after an unattended recording session. For this, MythTV
provides <a href="http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Mythwelcome"><font face="Courier New">mythwelcome(1)</font></a> which
is a helper program to start the MythTV frontend<sup>[2]</sup>. The trick that made
is work for me was to instruct<sup>[3]</sup><font face="Courier New">mythwelcome(1)</font> to <i>not</i> start <font face="Courier New">mythfrontend(1)</font> automatically:
This overcomes a problem with session management in Ubuntu and mythwelcome, and allows
the box to shutdown automatically after it completed recording. 
<br /></p>
        <p>
Bottom line is that I am quite happy with my MythTV box for now. 
<br /></p>
        <b>tag:</b>
        <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Ubuntu" rel="tag">Ubuntu</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/MythTV" rel="tag">MythTV</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/mythwelcome" rel="tag">mythwelcome</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag">Audio</a><p>
[1] There are quite a few of tutorials on ACPI wakup out there, many using nvram-wakeup.
Discard all these, and only use those centered on <font face="Courier New">/proc/acpi/alarm</font>,
instead (if you can). 
<br /></p><p>
[2]  Mythbuntu Gutsy is actually quite smart about using <font face="Courier New">mythwelcome(1)</font>:
You only need to go into <font face="Courier New">/etc/mythtv/session-settings</font> and
enable the welcome shell. No need to change the <font face="Courier New">mythstartup.sh</font> script. 
<br /></p><p>
[3] Press the 'i' key while in <font face="Courier New">mythwelcome(1)</font> to configure
this. 
<br /></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=fe6a6810-1dc4-4b8c-97a3-8167e8b52b99" /></body>
      <title>My new favorite: MythTV</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,fe6a6810-1dc4-4b8c-97a3-8167e8b52b99.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2008/01/26/My+New+Favorite+MythTV.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
For years I have been playing around with all kinds of computer based TV and multi-media
solutions and toys: Windows MCE in its various editions from 2004 to Vista, early
versions of MythTV and proprietary stuff. Until now none of these where really at
a point where they were actually useful for a family room: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While Windows did have a reasonable UI from the start, the fact that it recorded to
a highly proprietary format with nasty DRM implication was a deal-killer right from
the start. Some of the tuner-cards (like ATI) attempted to mitigate this by bundling
plugins for MPEG-2 conversion, but these were implemented rather clumsily and had
frequent failures. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
MythTV was - until recently - also more of a geek toy: nice for my lab or office,
but nothing I could really throw at my family. Now, with the 0.20 config found in
the Gutsy release of Mythbuntu, MythTV takes a rather large leap towards usability.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The UI is basically usable and driver support (especially for the tuner cards) is
becoming acceptable. I am using an WinTV HVR-950 USB stick now with my digital-over-the-air
setup and there is not a lot more I could ask for in terms of device support. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The proprietary NVidia drivers are good enough and support the motion extensions that
are needed to offload motion processing to the GPU. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For audio, I require at the very least S/PDIF support (mostly for lossy Dolby Digital,
but there is no other format like e.g. MLP being used for digital TV at this time),
which has been quite painful, but ultimately doable. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There seems to be decent remote support, but I am right now still fighting with my
old ATI Remote Wonder (I think that I will cave in here at some point in time though). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The by far most important factor for family room usability for me is RTC wakeup: I
could not near having a computer with its nasty fans running all the time. Enter ACPI
controlled RTC wakeup: using a &lt;a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MythTV/Install/WhatNext/ACPIWake"&gt;couple
of scripts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt;[1]&lt;/sup&gt;, I was able to make the MythTV box boot up in time for
any show that I wanted to record. Very cool.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One thing that I was fighting with in the end was a problem with the way MythTV could
be shut down automatically after an unattended recording session. For this, MythTV
provides &lt;a href="http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Mythwelcome"&gt;&lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;mythwelcome(1)&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt; which
is a helper program to start the MythTV frontend&lt;sup&gt;[2]&lt;/sup&gt;. The trick that made
is work for me was to instruct&lt;sup&gt;[3]&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;mythwelcome(1)&lt;/font&gt; to &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; start &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;mythfrontend(1)&lt;/font&gt; automatically:
This overcomes a problem with session management in Ubuntu and mythwelcome, and allows
the box to shutdown automatically after it completed recording. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Bottom line is that I am quite happy with my MythTV box for now. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Ubuntu" rel="tag"&gt;Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/MythTV" rel="tag"&gt;MythTV&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/mythwelcome" rel="tag"&gt;mythwelcome&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag"&gt;Audio&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
[1] There are quite a few of tutorials on ACPI wakup out there, many using nvram-wakeup.
Discard all these, and only use those centered on &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;/proc/acpi/alarm&lt;/font&gt;,
instead (if you can). 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
[2]&amp;nbsp; Mythbuntu Gutsy is actually quite smart about using &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;mythwelcome(1)&lt;/font&gt;:
You only need to go into &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;/etc/mythtv/session-settings&lt;/font&gt; and
enable the welcome shell. No need to change the &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;mythstartup.sh&lt;/font&gt; script. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
[3] Press the 'i' key while in &lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;mythwelcome(1)&lt;/font&gt; to configure
this. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=fe6a6810-1dc4-4b8c-97a3-8167e8b52b99" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,fe6a6810-1dc4-4b8c-97a3-8167e8b52b99.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
      <category>General</category>
      <category>Tips and Tricks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=c93e317e-fff5-48b2-9833-8857f1166136</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,c93e317e-fff5-48b2-9833-8857f1166136.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,c93e317e-fff5-48b2-9833-8857f1166136.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c93e317e-fff5-48b2-9833-8857f1166136</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I recently ran across this most excellent site on the acoustical crimes of the 'content <strike>mafia</strike> community':
http://www.turnmeup.org/
</p>
        <p>
You will find here a lot of infomation on why louder is not better (contrary to popular
belief) and what has already been sacrified in the arms race to produce even louder
music. My favorite from there is this video:
</p>
        <p>
          <object height="373" width="425">
            <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3Gmex_4hreQ&amp;rel=1&amp;border=1" />
            <param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
            <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3Gmex_4hreQ&amp;rel=1&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="373" width="425">
            </embed>
          </object>
        </p>
        <p>
Enjoy. 
</p>
        <p>
          <b>tag:</b>
          <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag">Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/MP3" rel="tag">MP3</a></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=c93e317e-fff5-48b2-9833-8857f1166136" />
      </body>
      <title>One more thing on audio quality</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,c93e317e-fff5-48b2-9833-8857f1166136.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2008/01/11/One+More+Thing+On+Audio+Quality.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I recently ran across this most excellent site on the acoustical crimes of the 'content &lt;strike&gt;mafia&lt;/strike&gt; community':
http://www.turnmeup.org/
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You will find here a lot of infomation on why louder is not better (contrary to popular
belief) and what has already been sacrified in the arms race to produce even louder
music. My favorite from there is this video:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;object height="373" width="425"&gt;
&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3Gmex_4hreQ&amp;amp;rel=1&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;
&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3Gmex_4hreQ&amp;amp;rel=1&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="373" width="425"&gt;
&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Enjoy. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag"&gt;Audio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/MP3" rel="tag"&gt;MP3&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=c93e317e-fff5-48b2-9833-8857f1166136" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,c93e317e-fff5-48b2-9833-8857f1166136.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=24f231f8-bc08-4631-a570-7f4e630aa87d</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,24f231f8-bc08-4631-a570-7f4e630aa87d.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,24f231f8-bc08-4631-a570-7f4e630aa87d.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=24f231f8-bc08-4631-a570-7f4e630aa87d</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
It sometimes takes a little longer, but it seems that even the Rolling Stones Magazin
has <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/17777619/the_death_of_high_fidelity/print">finally
realized</a> that not all MP3 is good. Duh! But most unfortunately, the terrible habit
of extreme volume compression to make songs sound 'better' (i.e. louder) has been
creeping into the business for a long time (think of all the Red Hot Chilli Peppers
albums that could have been really good, but were compressed to death). 
</p>
        <p>
MP3 and other lossy formats amplify this problem, since they are often consumed through
extremely lo-fi speakers and headphones. To compensate for the inadequate reproduction
equipment, producers are now not only waging a loudness war on our ears, but also
are starting to produce pop music in a way that avoids the obvious shortcomings of
compressed music, by de-emphasizing high frequencies etc. 
</p>
        <p>
Please do not get me wrong: a decently implemented lossy format (like the LAME MP3
encoder) can provide a lot of musicality with very significant space savings for small
devices. But most properly recorded and produced music will simply sound a lot better
on a decent audio system, with a CD/PCM audio at 44.1 kHz/16 bit (or better: DVD-Audio
or SACD at even higher rates) as the source and a good DAC. 
</p>
        <p>
It can only be hoped that the current MP3 hype will eventually run out and compressed
lossy format will find their appropriate niche for small mobile devices. 
</p>
        <p>
          <b>tag:</b>
          <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag">Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/MP3" rel="tag">MP3</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/High%20Fidelity" rel="tag">High
Fidelity</a></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=24f231f8-bc08-4631-a570-7f4e630aa87d" />
      </body>
      <title>High Fidelity? Where?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,24f231f8-bc08-4631-a570-7f4e630aa87d.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2007/12/29/High+Fidelity+Where.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
It sometimes takes a little longer, but it seems that even the Rolling Stones Magazin
has &lt;a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/17777619/the_death_of_high_fidelity/print"&gt;finally
realized&lt;/a&gt; that not all MP3 is good. Duh! But most unfortunately, the terrible habit
of extreme volume compression to make songs sound 'better' (i.e. louder) has been
creeping into the business for a long time (think of all the Red Hot Chilli Peppers
albums that could have been really good, but were compressed to death). 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
MP3 and other lossy formats amplify this problem, since they are often consumed through
extremely lo-fi speakers and headphones. To compensate for the inadequate reproduction
equipment, producers are now not only waging a loudness war on our ears, but also
are starting to produce pop music in a way that avoids the obvious shortcomings of
compressed music, by de-emphasizing high frequencies etc. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Please do not get me wrong: a decently implemented lossy format (like the LAME MP3
encoder) can provide a lot of musicality with very significant space savings for small
devices. But most properly recorded and produced music will simply sound a lot better
on a decent audio system, with a CD/PCM audio at 44.1 kHz/16 bit (or better: DVD-Audio
or SACD at even higher rates) as the source and a good DAC. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It can only be hoped that the current MP3 hype will eventually run out and compressed
lossy format will find their appropriate niche for small mobile devices. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag"&gt;Audio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/MP3" rel="tag"&gt;MP3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/High%20Fidelity" rel="tag"&gt;High
Fidelity&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=24f231f8-bc08-4631-a570-7f4e630aa87d" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,24f231f8-bc08-4631-a570-7f4e630aa87d.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=c9db19ce-4a6a-467b-bc69-c24f15d061d4</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,c9db19ce-4a6a-467b-bc69-c24f15d061d4.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,c9db19ce-4a6a-467b-bc69-c24f15d061d4.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c9db19ce-4a6a-467b-bc69-c24f15d061d4</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Constantin describes in <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/how_to_burn_high_resolution">this
article</a> how to create an DVD-Audio disc on Linux/Solaris (and also emphasizes
the difference between DVD-Audio and DVD-Video).
</p>
        <p>
I assume that most people who are interested in DVD-Audio know that there are also
commercial DVD-A solutions out there, like <a href="http://www.discwelder.com/">DiscWelder</a>. 
</p>
        <p>
However, for the task at hand Constantin would not have needed to create a DVD-Audio
disc, but instead could have simply used his favorite DVD-Video authoring tool and
create a stereo 96kHz/24bit LPCM track on a DVD-Video. All fully compatible DVD-V
players must support this format, thus you do not have to resort to DVD-Audio. 
</p>
        <p>
This is obviously different for multi-channel formats where the DVD-Audio format is
the only viable alternative. For high-resolution, multi-channel tracks, you will also
need an MLP encoder ... and here we are talking about some serious licensing fees. 
</p>
        <p>
          <b>tag:</b>
          <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DVD-Audio" rel="tag">DVD-Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DVD-Video" rel="tag">DVD-Video</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/High-Definition" rel="tag">High-Definition</a></p>
        <p>
PS: <a href="http://www3.toshiba.co.jp/dvd/e/whats/index.htm">Here</a> is an overview
on the DVD-Video audio capabilities.<br /></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=c9db19ce-4a6a-467b-bc69-c24f15d061d4" />
      </body>
      <title>96 kHz / 24 bit media</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,c9db19ce-4a6a-467b-bc69-c24f15d061d4.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2007/10/22/96+KHz+24+Bit+Media.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Constantin describes in &lt;a href="http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/how_to_burn_high_resolution"&gt;this
article&lt;/a&gt; how to create an DVD-Audio disc on Linux/Solaris (and also emphasizes
the difference between DVD-Audio and DVD-Video).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I assume that most people who are interested in DVD-Audio know that there are also
commercial DVD-A solutions out there, like &lt;a href="http://www.discwelder.com/"&gt;DiscWelder&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
However, for the task at hand Constantin would not have needed to create a DVD-Audio
disc, but instead could have simply used his favorite DVD-Video authoring tool and
create a stereo 96kHz/24bit LPCM track on a DVD-Video. All fully compatible DVD-V
players must support this format, thus you do not have to resort to DVD-Audio. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is obviously different for multi-channel formats where the DVD-Audio format is
the only viable alternative. For high-resolution, multi-channel tracks, you will also
need an MLP encoder ... and here we are talking about some serious licensing fees. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DVD-Audio" rel="tag"&gt;DVD-Audio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DVD-Video" rel="tag"&gt;DVD-Video&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/High-Definition" rel="tag"&gt;High-Definition&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
PS: &lt;a href="http://www3.toshiba.co.jp/dvd/e/whats/index.htm"&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is an overview
on the DVD-Video audio capabilities.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=c9db19ce-4a6a-467b-bc69-c24f15d061d4" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,c9db19ce-4a6a-467b-bc69-c24f15d061d4.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=aaef9aae-1068-40b9-9dbf-3a5712c73288</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,aaef9aae-1068-40b9-9dbf-3a5712c73288.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,aaef9aae-1068-40b9-9dbf-3a5712c73288.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=aaef9aae-1068-40b9-9dbf-3a5712c73288</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I just ran across this song (from 2006) called <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zTPDVkVFOs">"Download
this Song" by MC Lars</a>. You can certainly debate the quality of the song itself
(although I still very much like "The Passenger"), but the point he is trying to make
is probably quite right: 10 years from now, CDs will probably be considered either
audiophile, totally redundant, or both. Popular music will at that time be produced,
promoted, distributed, and listened to online. 
</p>
        <p>
However, I doubt that the small, but dedicated group of people interested in classical,
contemporary, or Jazz music will be that easily converted - at least not without CD
equivalent (or better) download offers.
</p>
        <p>
Anyway, here is the video:
</p>
        <p>
          <object height="350" width="425">
            <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2zTPDVkVFOs" />
            <param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
            <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2zTPDVkVFOs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425">
            </embed>
          </object>
        </p>
        <p>
          <b>tag:</b>
          <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/humor" rel="tag">humor</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/music" rel="tag">music</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/audio" rel="tag">audio</a></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=aaef9aae-1068-40b9-9dbf-3a5712c73288" />
      </body>
      <title>Future of Music ... Really?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,aaef9aae-1068-40b9-9dbf-3a5712c73288.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2007/09/25/Future+Of+Music+Really.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:07:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I just ran across this song (from 2006) called &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zTPDVkVFOs"&gt;"Download
this Song" by MC Lars&lt;/a&gt;. You can certainly debate the quality of the song itself
(although I still very much like "The Passenger"), but the point he is trying to make
is probably quite right: 10 years from now, CDs will probably be considered either
audiophile, totally redundant, or both. Popular music will at that time be produced,
promoted, distributed, and listened to online. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
However, I doubt that the small, but dedicated group of people interested in classical,
contemporary, or Jazz music will be that easily converted - at least not without CD
equivalent (or better) download offers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Anyway, here is the video:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;object height="350" width="425"&gt;
&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2zTPDVkVFOs"&gt;
&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2zTPDVkVFOs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"&gt;
&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/humor" rel="tag"&gt;humor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/music" rel="tag"&gt;music&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/audio" rel="tag"&gt;audio&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=aaef9aae-1068-40b9-9dbf-3a5712c73288" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,aaef9aae-1068-40b9-9dbf-3a5712c73288.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
      <category>General</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=0cfd63b2-a9c0-4668-ae1d-57c6db86409b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,0cfd63b2-a9c0-4668-ae1d-57c6db86409b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=0cfd63b2-a9c0-4668-ae1d-57c6db86409b</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Constantin wrote a <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/so_where_s_the_future">nice
article</a> on high-resolution audio, that I would really recommend to audio fans.
I especially like the section on the shortcomings of CDs and some of the psychoacoustics
behind it. 
<br /><br />
Just adding a few things: 
<br /><ul><li>
DVD-Audio discs are also found on the DVD layer of DualDiscs. The beasts are two-sided
media, that have a Red Book CD side and a DVD side. If you own e.g. some of the re-releases
of the Talking Heads (the <a href="http://www.talking-heads.net/brick.html">Brick</a>),
you have DualDiscs with high-resolution (96 kHZ/24 bit - 5.1 and Stereo) audio. There
are two major caveats with the DualDiscs: some do not feature DVD-A content, but rather
a DVD-Video version, some interviews or live concert video coverage. The other problem
is that a few CD players have reported issues when playing back the CD side, it is
not 100% conformant to the physical characteristics of Red Book discs. I have yet
to see a player where is would be the case. 
<br />
One of my favorite DualDiscs (beside the Talking Heads) is the 20th anniversary release
of "Brothers in Arms" from the Dire Straights in DVD-A. 
<br /></li><li>
To make all things codec even more complicated, starting with the new HD video media
there are now also new HD audio codecs: 
<br /></li><ul><li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_TrueHD">Dolby TrueHD</a>: Finally a code
from Dolby that does not take away half the audio information, TrueHD is a 14 discrete
channel container using MLP compression. 
<br /></li><li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Theater_System#DTS_variants">DTS HD
Master Audio</a>: Another lossless HD contender, this time from DTS, with not logical
limit on the number of discrete channels. 
<br /></li></ul><li>
It was quite obvious that the content <strike>mafia</strike> industry would insist
on delivering broken products for high-definition reproduction: thus was born the
completely useless HDCP scheme, that damages the HDMI (and DVI) transport beyond repair.
Unless your system is blessed with the right keys for decrypting HDCP-scrambled packages,
you will not see any HD content on your system. Microsoft is deeply in cahoots with
these <strike>dubious characters</strike> businessmen and intentionally damaged Vista
to not properly display movies or High Resolution audio, as <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,135814-c,windowsbugs/article.html">Peter
Gutmann recently explained</a>. 
<br /></li><li>
There is at least one more source for high-resolution audio links - and it is even
free: check out the <a href="http://www.archive.org/">Internet Archive</a>, <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/audio">music
section</a>. A lot of band allow fans to publish bootlegged versions of their concerts
in any format, resulting in (sometime) really nice quality recordings at high bitrates. 
<br /></li></ul><b>tag:</b><a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DVD-Audio" rel="tag">DVD-Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DRM" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/High-Definition" rel="tag">High-Definition</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag">Audio</a><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=0cfd63b2-a9c0-4668-ae1d-57c6db86409b" /></body>
      <title>Digressing just once more</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,0cfd63b2-a9c0-4668-ae1d-57c6db86409b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2007/08/13/Digressing+Just+Once+More.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:42:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Constantin wrote a &lt;a href="http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/so_where_s_the_future"&gt;nice
article&lt;/a&gt; on high-resolution audio, that I would really recommend to audio fans.
I especially like the section on the shortcomings of CDs and some of the psychoacoustics
behind it. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just adding a few things: 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
DVD-Audio discs are also found on the DVD layer of DualDiscs. The beasts are two-sided
media, that have a Red Book CD side and a DVD side. If you own e.g. some of the re-releases
of the Talking Heads (the &lt;a href="http://www.talking-heads.net/brick.html"&gt;Brick&lt;/a&gt;),
you have DualDiscs with high-resolution (96 kHZ/24 bit - 5.1 and Stereo) audio. There
are two major caveats with the DualDiscs: some do not feature DVD-A content, but rather
a DVD-Video version, some interviews or live concert video coverage. The other problem
is that a few CD players have reported issues when playing back the CD side, it is
not 100% conformant to the physical characteristics of Red Book discs. I have yet
to see a player where is would be the case. 
&lt;br&gt;
One of my favorite DualDiscs (beside the Talking Heads) is the 20th anniversary release
of "Brothers in Arms" from the Dire Straights in DVD-A. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
To make all things codec even more complicated, starting with the new HD video media
there are now also new HD audio codecs: 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_TrueHD"&gt;Dolby TrueHD&lt;/a&gt;: Finally a code
from Dolby that does not take away half the audio information, TrueHD is a 14 discrete
channel container using MLP compression. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Theater_System#DTS_variants"&gt;DTS HD
Master Audio&lt;/a&gt;: Another lossless HD contender, this time from DTS, with not logical
limit on the number of discrete channels. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
It was quite obvious that the content &lt;strike&gt;mafia&lt;/strike&gt; industry would insist
on delivering broken products for high-definition reproduction: thus was born the
completely useless HDCP scheme, that damages the HDMI (and DVI) transport beyond repair.
Unless your system is blessed with the right keys for decrypting HDCP-scrambled packages,
you will not see any HD content on your system. Microsoft is deeply in cahoots with
these &lt;strike&gt;dubious characters&lt;/strike&gt; businessmen and intentionally damaged Vista
to not properly display movies or High Resolution audio, as &lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,135814-c,windowsbugs/article.html"&gt;Peter
Gutmann recently explained&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
There is at least one more source for high-resolution audio links - and it is even
free: check out the &lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/"&gt;Internet Archive&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/details/audio"&gt;music
section&lt;/a&gt;. A lot of band allow fans to publish bootlegged versions of their concerts
in any format, resulting in (sometime) really nice quality recordings at high bitrates. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DVD-Audio" rel="tag"&gt;DVD-Audio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DRM" rel="tag"&gt;DRM&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/High-Definition" rel="tag"&gt;High-Definition&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag"&gt;Audio&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=0cfd63b2-a9c0-4668-ae1d-57c6db86409b" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,0cfd63b2-a9c0-4668-ae1d-57c6db86409b.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.beuchelt.org/Trackback.aspx?guid=8e9e1713-f849-4502-825f-e40949aa2304</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.beuchelt.org/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,8e9e1713-f849-4502-825f-e40949aa2304.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Gerald Beuchelt</dc:creator>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beuchelt.org/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8e9e1713-f849-4502-825f-e40949aa2304</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Today's <a href="http://www.forbes.com/business/2007/08/10/universal-music-download-biz-media-cx_lh_0810bizuniversal.html">announcement</a> that
Universal has finally decided to come to senses is quite encouraging. In this, they
join the ranks of EMI that <a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;ct=us/1-0&amp;fp=46bc276f4fe44f60&amp;ei=_Xe8RoWzKY_CowLe74mzDw&amp;url=http%3A//www.ecommercetimes.com/story/entertainment/58684.html&amp;cid=0">reported</a> very
positive revenue figures for their DRM free music. These are certainly encouraging
signs that the music industry is finally recognizing that times have changed and that
the <a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2007/08/michelle-santangelo-opposes-riaa.html">People</a> are
not their enemy, but instead potential customers. 
</p>
        <p>
I would like to take this occasion to point to a record company that should be regognized
for their groundbreaking approach to music distribution: <a href="http://www.linnrecords.com/">Linn
Records</a>, subsidy of the well-regarded <a href="http://www.linn.co.uk/">Linn</a> audio
products. Not only have they been selling DRM-free MP3s for quite some time now, but
much more important, they are offering for a large part of their selection CD quality
and - even better - studio master quality downloads. Note that these are not merely
high bitrate MP3s, but in the case of the CD quality downloads they ship 44.1 kHz/16
bit resolution, for High Resolution it is mostly in 88.2 kHz or 96 kHz and 24 bit
quantization. To make this even better, the files formats are either WAV (uncompressed)
or the free lossless compression format <a href="http://flac.sourceforge.net/">FLAC</a>.
Burning the bit to CD or DVD-A is actually encouraged.
</p>
        <p>
Currently these downloads are all in stereo only. But upon request, a spokesperson
told me that they are actively looking into the possibility to releasing some of their
5.1 music in high resolution. 
<br /></p>
        <p>
If that got you interested, you might also want to take a look at their physical products:
many of their releases are available in SACD and/or HDCD, and the artistic quality
is - from what I heard so far - pretty good. 
<br /></p>
        <p>
          <b>tag:</b>
          <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DVD-Audio" rel="tag">DVD-Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/SACD" rel="tag">SACD</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/High-Definition" rel="tag">High-Definition</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag">Audio</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DRM" rel="tag">DRM</a></p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=8e9e1713-f849-4502-825f-e40949aa2304" />
      </body>
      <title>Music Downloads: Spotlight on Linn Records</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beuchelt.org/PermaLink,guid,8e9e1713-f849-4502-825f-e40949aa2304.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.beuchelt.org/2007/08/10/Music+Downloads+Spotlight+On+Linn+Records.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:49:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Today's &lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/business/2007/08/10/universal-music-download-biz-media-cx_lh_0810bizuniversal.html"&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt; that
Universal has finally decided to come to senses is quite encouraging. In this, they
join the ranks of EMI that &lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;amp;ct=us/1-0&amp;amp;fp=46bc276f4fe44f60&amp;amp;ei=_Xe8RoWzKY_CowLe74mzDw&amp;amp;url=http%3A//www.ecommercetimes.com/story/entertainment/58684.html&amp;amp;cid=0"&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; very
positive revenue figures for their DRM free music. These are certainly encouraging
signs that the music industry is finally recognizing that times have changed and that
the &lt;a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2007/08/michelle-santangelo-opposes-riaa.html"&gt;People&lt;/a&gt; are
not their enemy, but instead potential customers. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I would like to take this occasion to point to a record company that should be regognized
for their groundbreaking approach to music distribution: &lt;a href="http://www.linnrecords.com/"&gt;Linn
Records&lt;/a&gt;, subsidy of the well-regarded &lt;a href="http://www.linn.co.uk/"&gt;Linn&lt;/a&gt; audio
products. Not only have they been selling DRM-free MP3s for quite some time now, but
much more important, they are offering for a large part of their selection CD quality
and - even better - studio master quality downloads. Note that these are not merely
high bitrate MP3s, but in the case of the CD quality downloads they ship 44.1 kHz/16
bit resolution, for High Resolution it is mostly in 88.2 kHz or 96 kHz and 24 bit
quantization. To make this even better, the files formats are either WAV (uncompressed)
or the free lossless compression format &lt;a href="http://flac.sourceforge.net/"&gt;FLAC&lt;/a&gt;.
Burning the bit to CD or DVD-A is actually encouraged.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Currently these downloads are all in stereo only. But upon request, a spokesperson
told me that they are actively looking into the possibility to releasing some of their
5.1 music in high resolution. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If that got you interested, you might also want to take a look at their physical products:
many of their releases are available in SACD and/or HDCD, and the artistic quality
is - from what I heard so far - pretty good. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;tag:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DVD-Audio" rel="tag"&gt;DVD-Audio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/SACD" rel="tag"&gt;SACD&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/High-Definition" rel="tag"&gt;High-Definition&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Audio" rel="tag"&gt;Audio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/DRM" rel="tag"&gt;DRM&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.beuchelt.org/aggbug.ashx?id=8e9e1713-f849-4502-825f-e40949aa2304" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.beuchelt.org/CommentView,guid,8e9e1713-f849-4502-825f-e40949aa2304.aspx</comments>
      <category>Audio</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>