Going forward, I expect that SACD will get a lot of attention, especially from the labels (see e.g. the Genesis re-releases on SACD). The reason for this is quite simple IMO: SACD the the *ONLY* format that has not been hacked so far - all others (including BluRay and HD-DVD) are copyable. And I think that this will stay like this for quite a while for the following reasons:
You might argue that you could sample the analog out at 96 kHz or better or capture the converted PCM from some hacked HDMI conversion player. All this would require a lot of expertise and probably some fairly expensive hardware, again making this approach not attractive to the mainstream user.
No even if you overcame all these hurdles, you'd need to play the 5.1 96KHz track somewhere. The only easy-to-use solution today is the creation of a DVD-Audio disc (which is not trivial or expensive). Alternatively, you would need a decent PC with a 6 analog out and some knowledge to configure the soundcard(s) properly ... not mainstream user, again.
Instead, they would simply copy the RedBook data from Hybrid discs and be happy. Therefore, I think that at least the SACD will survive the HD wars.
tag: DVD-Audio, SACD, High-Definition, Audio
Copyright by Gerald Beuchelt.
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.
In addition, my opinions can change. This weblog provides a momentary snapshot of such opinions. Existing posts that were written in the past do not necessarily reflect my current thoughts and opinions.
For the purposes of attribution, the author is "Gerald Beuchelt" and attribution shall provide a (clickable, where possible) URL to this site.
© 2009, Gerald Beuchelt
E-mail